[Digital evaluation of supracrestal gingival thickness induced by periodontal regenerative and corticotomy surgery in patients with skeletal class â ¢ malocclusion].

Objective: To establish a quantitative three-dimensional method based on intraoral scan to evaluate the changes of soft tissue, and to evaluate the changes of supracrestal gingival thickness (SGT) in skeletal class Ⅲ patients induced by periodontal regenerative and corticotomy surgery (PRCS). Methods: Twenty-two systematically and periodontally healthy skeletal class Ⅲ patients (4 males and 18 females, aged between 19 and 35 years), who were in need of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment and referred to the Department of Periodontology from the Department of Orthodontics and the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from January, 2018 to March, 2019, were collected in the study. The teeth involved were 112 anterior teeth (46 maxillary anterior teeth and 66 mandibular anterior teeth). PRCS in anterior tooth area was conducted before orthodontic decompensation. Probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI) and keratinized gingiva width (KGW) were recorded before surgery and 6 months post-surgery. The intraoral digital impressions of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth were obtained by 3-shape intraoral scanner before surgery and 6 months after surgery. The Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files were processed using Geomagic qualify 12.2 software to establish the soft tissue morphological measurement model, and to quantitatively analyze the changes of gingival thickness situated 1 to 2 mm apical to the free gingival margin on the median sagittal measurement plane. Results: Probing depth and bleeding index had no significant difference before and 6 months after operation (P>0.05). KGW in 6-month post-operation group [(5.18±2.32) mm] was significantly higher than that in pre-operation group [(4.22±1.43) mm] (P<0.05). Supracrestal gingival thickness situated 1 to 2 mm apical to the free gingival margin also significantly increased 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). The changes of gingival thickness situated 1 to 2 mm apical to the free gingival margin in the upper anterior area were (0.68±0.56) and (1.00±0.69) mm, respectively. The changes in the lower anterior area were (0.38±0.42) and (0.58±0.45) mm, respectively. The gingival changes of the upper anterior teeth were also significantly higher than those of the lower anterior teeth (P<0.01). Conclusions: The described quantitative measurement based on intraoral scan could be an effective method for quantitative evaluation of the changes of soft tissue. PRCS could safely increase the supracrestal gingival thickness as well as KGW in skeletal class Ⅲ patients who were in need of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.

[Alveolar crest and relevant analysis of labial side of anterior teeth on skeletal Angle class III patients].

OBJECTIVE: To measure the distance from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC) of labial side of anterior teeth on skeletal Angle class III patients under direct vision during periodontal bone augmentation surgery and to make relevant analysis to find the relevant factors. METHODS: In the study, 46 skeletal Angle class III patients (10 males and 36 females) received periodontal bone augmentation surgery of anterior teeth were included, with 67 jaws (27 maxillae and 40 mandibles) and 400 anterior teeth (161 maxillary anterior teeth and 239 mandibular anterior teeth). The mean age was 23.65 years. Maxillary anterior teeth consisted of 54 central incisors, 53 lateral incisors and 54 canines. Mandibular anterior teeth consisted of 79 central incisors, 80 lateral incisors and 80 canines. CEJ-AC was measured in three sites (mesial sites, central sites and distal sites) by Williams periodontal probes during periodontal bone augmentation surgery under direct vision by the same researcher. RESULTS: The average CEJ-AC of 400 anterior teeth was (2.21±1.48) mm. The average CEJ-AC of maxillary anterior teeth was (1.72±1.13) mm, more than (2.54±1.60) mm of mandibular anterior teeth (P<0.05). The average CEJ-AC of canines was (2.42±1.78) mm, more than (2.06±1.27) mm of central incisors or (2.16±1.32) mm of lateral incisors (P<0.05). The average CEJ-AC of central sites was (3.04±2.01) mm, more than (1.79±0.86) mm of mesial sites or (1.81±0.89) mm of distal sites (P<0.05). CEJ-AC of 233 anterior teeth was more than 2 mm, accounting for 58.25%, and 117 anterior teeth with dehiscence were found, accounting for 29.25%. Multilevel and multivariate Logistic regression showed age, jaw, tooth and site were the relevant factors to the position of alveolar crest. CONCLUSION: The position of alveolar crest of skeletal Angle class III patients who received periodontal bone augmentation surgery was lower than that of the general population, causing periodontal risks during decompensation orthodontics therapy before orthognathic surgery. The position of alveolar crest was lower in older patients than in younger patients, in mandibular teeth than in maxillary teeth, in canines than in central incisors or lateral incisors, and in central sites than in mesial sites or distal sites of labial side, which showed much higher risk.

[Accuracy analysis of alveolar dehiscence and fenestration of maxillary anterior teeth of Angle class III by cone-beam CT].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of detecting alveolar bone dehiscence and fenestration of maxillary anterior teeth of Angle class III by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: Eighteen Angle class III patients with 108 maxillary anterior teeth were included (3 males and 15 females) who accepted modified corticotomy in orthodontic therapy. The mean age was 23.6 years (18-30 years). The clinical detection of dehiscence and fenestration was done when modified corticotomy was performed by the same periodontist. The CBCT examination was conducted pre-operation and the detection of dehiscence and fenestration by CBCT was done by two periodontists. The data in modified corticotomy were used as the golden standard to calculate the parameters, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Youden index (YI), positive and negative likelihood ratio. Kappa statistic was used to analyze the agreement between the clinical detection and the CBCT detection. RESULTS: The incidence of dehiscence and fenestration was about 10.19% and 13.89% respectively, which mainly occurred on lateral incisors and canines. The median values of length and width of dehiscence were about 5 mm and 4 mm, and the median values of length and width of fenestration were 3 mm and 2 mm, respectively. Most fenestrations were detected on the middle third to the apical third of the root. For dehiscence, the agreement between clinical detection and CBCT detection was statistically significant (P<0.05). For fenestration, the agreement between clinical detection and CBCT detection was statistically significant (P<0.05). The values of sensitivity and specificity for detecting dehiscence were more than 0.7. The values of positive and negative predictive values for detecting dehiscence were 0.44 and 0.97. The values of sensitivity and specificity for detecting fenestration were 0.93 and 0.52. The values of positive and negative predictive values for detecting fenestration were 0.24 and 0.98. CONCLUSION: For dehiscence, the agreement between clinical detection and CBCT detection was good. For fenestration, the agreement between clinical detection and CBCT detection was general. Detection of dehiscence and fenestration of maxillary anterior teeth of Angle class III by CBCT had limited diagnostic value in clinical practice with overestimation of dehiscence and fenestration incidence.

[Efficacy of subgingival glycine air polishing on patients with early peri-implant diseases].

Objective: To compare the clinical efficacies of subgingival glycine air polishing and ultrasonic scaling combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing on patients with early peri-implant diseases (peri-implant mucositis and early peri-implantitis). Methods: Twenty-two systemically healthy patients with totally 42 implants and early peri-implant diseases, were recruited in this study. The patients were randomly divided into the test group and the control group. Patients in the test group were treated with subgingival glycine air polishing and patients in the control group were treated with ultrasonic scalers combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing. Periodontal parameters such as probing depth, bleeding index, plaque index and clinical attachment loss, at baseline and 2 months after treatment, respectively, were collected and compared between the test and control groups. Results: For the natural teeth, the parameters of probing depth, bleeding index, plaque index and attachment loss in the two groups were significantly improved after treatments (medians were 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, 1.00 vs-0.13, 0.38 vs 0.50, 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, respectively for test and control group). There was no statistical difference of median between the two groups after treatment except for that of the attachment loss (medians, 0.48 mm vs 0.22 mm, P=0.034). For the implants, differences of parameters in the two groups at baseline were insignificant. After treatments, the probing depths significantly decreased by 0.67 mm and 0.33 mm in the test group and the control group, respectively. The inter-group differences, however, were insignificant. Significant difference of the bleeding index after treatment was found in the test group (P=0.019), but not in the control group. No adverse reactions were found on patients in the two groups after treatments. Conclusions: Efficacy of subgingival glycine air polishing and ultrasonic scaling combined with 0.12% chlorhexidine rinsing is competitive on patients with early peri-implant diseases. However, the former treatment may be more effective oncontrolling the early peri-implant inflammation.